![]() Then I ask myself, where is its home? And now the answer is scan it. When will it be done? I schedule a time to do that in my calender, on Tuesday at one o'clock. I ask, what is the next step? And maybe I say the next step is that I need to draft a response. So I pick up a paper and first process it. So instead of scanning items first, I move the step of scanning to where it belongs, which is right after the where is its home question. And the more gathering points we have, the less efficient we're going to become. You've moved something from a physical inbox to a digital inbox that you are now going to have to check in addition to everything else. Also, scanning paper before processing essentially creates a new gathering point. The problem with putting scanning before processing is that keeping that paper might be unnecessary. Whenever new paper comes in, they scan it into a scanner, which automatically puts it into a folder. The questions are: what is the next step, meaning what is the next action I'll take? When will it be done, meaning when will I schedule time in my calendar to work on it? And where is its home, meaning where is its final storage place? Some people try to insert the act of converting something that is paper into something digital before all of these questions are asked. Processing is responding to three questions when you pick up an item from your inbox, such as an important paper. At what point in your system should something that is paper be converted to something that is digital? In Time Management Fundamentals, I talk about the importance of processing on a weekly basis. If that's the situation you're in, then let's focus on one thing. That said, I recognize that some people are big fans of having a paperless office. Being organized is not in and of itself a virtue. If a system, like setting up a paperless office, gets in the way of achieving the result, then I discourage people from trying to implement it. When it comes to time management, the result is more important than anything else. My perspective is that of trying to help people be more productive, to focus on the things that are most valuable, and to take action. Yet, all too often, I find that a person's desire to have no paper at all in their office, in reality, creates slower productivity and more confusion in the office. There can be some benefit to streamlining and getting rid of the clutter. It's not that there's anything wrong with it. After having taught principles of organization for many years, both one-on-one and online, I've not become an advocate for the paperless office. In this video, I don't want to replace what's done there, but, rather, just offer my perspective, which may be a bit unique. ![]() That will walk you through the whole concept of how to set this up. Will this work with a paperless office? How do I create a paperless office? If this is something that interests you, I recommend looking at a course here on the library titled Going Paperless: Start to Finish. ![]() Occasionally, people who go through my Time Management Fundamentals course ask me about the paperless office. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |